Three questions. Three separate records.
BPNI is the broad research direction. Limen and MF-01 are concept studies that ask narrower questions inside it. Nothing here is a product, program, medical device, or offer.
ILLUSTRATIVE AMBIENT GEOMETRY — NOT A DEVICE, ARCHITECTURE, OR EVIDENCE
Open the 3D models- CONCEPT STUDY
- RESEARCH ONLY
- NO HUMAN TESTING
- NOT AVAILABLE
- NO DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM EXISTS
BPNI
Bidirectional peripheral neural interface
Recording activity from a peripheral nerve and delivering information back by stimulating it. A direction, not a demonstrated whole system.
Open BPNI ↗Limen
Two information paths, kept distinct
Asks whether an observed signal and a requested return signal can stay separate and attributable through one interface. No implant or product is selected.
Open Limen ↗MF-01
Observing recovery after a digital-nerve gap
A deliberately non-fitting model asks whether a temporary, reader-powered, non-stimulating interface could make recovery after an existing digital-nerve gap more observable.
Open MF-01 ↗A record is not a program.
None of these records carries validated dimensions, materials, anatomical fit, surgical route, electronics, stimulation, biomarker, safety, efficacy, novelty, patent, or regulatory status. Building anything is outside current authorization.